b

MISSION

 

TRUTH, JUSTICE, & RELIEF FOR GULF WAR VETERANS
 

 

These all surround covert counter-terrorism activities and a Law Suit filed by Peter Kawaja.

The charges laid in Kawaja's Suit have never been refuted. A few of the 34 counts in the Complaint are as follows ;

01.) False statements within a Government Agency, Title 18 USC ss 35.1001.

02.) WAR CRIMES - crimes when death occurs, Title 18 USC ss 34.

03.) Concealment, removal - Title 18 USC ss 2071.

04.) Aiding and Abetting, Title 18 USC s 3.

05.) Obstruction of Justice, Title 18 USC s 1505 / USC s 2 (26).

06.) Defrauding America, Title 18, USC s 1101 (25).

The legal action was brought by Peter Kawaja and the International Security Group, Inc., (1994) as Plaintiffs, v. various [named] Agents (agencies/US attorneys etc) of the U.S. Government and 100 John Does. (Bush Administration).

The UNITED STATES Government made a determination to appoint the US Attorney's Office to represent the Defendants, thereby admitting (in our observation) to the criminality's (and guilt). This decision to appoint "government" attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office to represent the Defendants was made after an initial response to the Plaintiff (Kawaja) filing Suit.

The government entered a pleading for a 45 day extension of time to respond to the Complaint, which was granted by Kawaja.

The Government of the UNITED STATES, after reviewing the Complaint by Kawaja, decided to pay for (at taxpayer expense), and represent all of the Defendants'. This indicates that the Government (after reviewing the charges within the Complaint), determined there was "liability" on the part of the government, which now had to extend its "protections" to these federal Defendants.

The U.S. Attorney's Office filed a  "DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT", on behalf of all the Defendants, on the basis of ABSOLUTE and QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.

The U.S. Attorney's Office entered into court records amongst many things, that indeed this case involved weapons of mass destruction to be used by terrorist nations against the United States. However, in the same pleading, the U.S. Attorney's Office states in their "Conclusion" : "The AUSA is protected by absolute immunity, and the agents are protected by qualified immunity."

The U.S. Attorney's Office plead that even if the Defendants committed these "misconduct" (CRIMES), all the Defendants should be granted immunity from Prosecution.

The U.S. Attorney's Office, never entered a pleading ; Refuting, Rebutting, or Denying "any" of the 34 Criminal charges, to include TREASON and WAR CRIMES.

Knowing the severity of the charges, the Judge in this case, instead of making a ruling himself (we suspect because he could not), had a Magistrate rule to Dismiss the case based on immunity. However, the chief Judge, some six months later (when in obvious DEFAULT), filed a response himself to other filings made by Peter Kawaja after the fraudulent (supposed) Dismissal, indicating, the case is not closed officially, as the Judge made a ruling on a filing almost six months "after the fact" (traversed). The case sits. Kawaja's Suit cannot be dismissed based on a pleading of immunity, and there are no statute of limitations for Treason, War Crimes, crimes against America, and murder.

Why can Kawaja's "evidence" be used in both civil and criminal actions ?

* Kawaja's "evidence" (that portion prior to Desert Storm) was seized under a fraudulent WAR POWERS ACT Search Warrant. However, evidence is safe.

* The U.S. Government not only seized this evidence, but Sealed it as U.S. National Security in 1990, prior to Operation Desert Storm. (It remains sealed to this day).

* Federal Agents swore under oath in the "affidavit for search" enough to both tie this evidence to the upcoming Gulf War, and that American Forces were knowingly placed in Harms Way. Yet the war proceeded and the evidence was sealed.

* The U.S. Government itself made this evidence National Security, and tied it to Binary Weapons to be used in the Gulf War - and did all this "prior to" the war.

* Kawaja's "evidence" is documented in Depositions under oath by federal agents, persons with criminal liability turned into now government witnesses, and by U.S. intelligence agencies.

* Kawaja's "evidence" has not been challenged by the U.S. Government, but in addition, Kawaja and his "evidence" has been established as factual and credible by the same US Government.

* Kawaja was Subpoenaed to three Federal Grand Juries "representing" the UNITED STATES. The U.S. presented Kawaja as "credible" and to be believed as "their expert" - to these "federal" Grand Juries .

* Precedent - by virtue of fact that Kawaja's original Suit and the criminal charges were never refuted, but the U.S. Government sought dismissal for its Agents based on immunity even if they did do it, future Suits by Kawaja can incorporate this fact.

* The President of the UNITED STATES-Bill Clinton, turned over certain portions of Kawaja's evidence to the DOD [March 29.1995], and the DOD opened a separate case (95-L95724) under Kawaja's name regarding Binary Weapons in the Gulf War.

* The following will substantiate "Prior Knowledge, Intent, Misprision of a felony" ;

  • The National Security Agency signed for / acknowledged receipt of document package to code name M323CF, on July 17, 1990 - prior to Desert Storm.
  • CIA Station Chief (name withheld here) / March 1990
  • US Customs (unnamed/redacted Agents and Commissioner Hallett) / April 1990
  • FBI - Washington / July 1989
  • FBI - Counterintelligence / August 1989
  • CIA - Virginia / May + August 1989
  • Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Subcommittee of Defense Technology and Chairman of the Joint Economic Subcommittee on Technology and National Security. [ US CONGRESS ] . 
  • John Scheibel - Subcommittee on International Economic Policy & Trade .
  • The President of the UNITED STATES, George Bush / April 1990.
  • OSI and the US Military interviews Kawaja on Jan.15. 1991 .
  • NSC - Brent Scowcroft / April 1990
  • James Baker III / April 1990
  • Howard Hebert / 1990 - 1991
  • Numerous others, 100 John Does

Did the President of the United States, Bill Clinton - tell the truth to the PAC on Gulf Illnesses Jan.7.1997 - when he responded : (verbatim) "No one has ever suggested that anybody intentionally imposed--exposed American soldiers to these dangers, and there is nothing--there is no reason that anyone in this government should ever do anything but just try to get at the truth and get it out and do what is right for the veterans."

Did Dr. Joyce Lashof of the PAC tell the truth when she said in response to a question about the possibility of a cover-up : "we found no evidence of a cover-up in our work."

Criminal and civil complaints can be brought on behalf of all Gulf Veterans, independent action on behalf the American civilian population, and yet another action on behalf of the entire World population.

The DSWCC is named Beneficiary to Peter Kawaja's "evidence", which is not restricted only to what is already filed in court, or what was taken in the illegal raid in 1990, but what else exists, what "CARE PACKAGES" came after the war, the whereabouts known only by Eileen Kawaja.

On the civil side, we can bring a Multi Billion Dollar class action suit and make it stick.

 

To accomplish our goals, we need to seek the truth behind Operation Desert Storm-Gulf War I (and now Gulf War II), as to;

  • Whether we did have to go to war with Iraq in Gulf War I  (and now Gulf War II),
     

  • Whether there was any emergency-urgent need to grant Informed Consent Waivers,
     

  • Whether there was any imminent danger of biological or chemical weapons exposure to warrant 11th hour mandatory unproven or unapproved Vaccines and other protective measures using the PB Pill,
     

  • What were the true contents of the vaccines,
     

  • Why service-members were not issued quick change Gas Mask filters as other coalition members,
     

  • Why the US failed to deploy and use our real-time biological weapons detection teams with their tested equipment,
     

  • What Agents (Nerve or otherwise), by name, was the Pyridostigmine Bromide Pill Targeted for ?
     

  • What was the original targeted nerve agents effect, stated by the DOD, in detail, without the administration of the PB pill as a protection ?
     

  • The PB Pill, as of 1994, has a new use; to alleviate the symptoms of Alzheimer's.  Is this approved by the FDA, and if so, where are the years of study (trials) to prove its safety in this new use ?  Were they provided by the DOD ?
     

  • Why was it worded in the federal register (#21 CFR Part 50) Page 52815, that this "Investigational Product is the only satisfactory protection against life threatening conditions", when the U.S. Military had other means to protect soldiers, such as Gas Masks and Chemical Protective Suits ?
     

  • What vaccines, by name, fell under the special rules of the IND and Informed Consent Waivers during the war ?
     

  • Law prevents DOD from using federal funds to do human research with federal funds.  How was the research on the IND's done, and who by name, funded it ?
     

  • Has the DOD applied for a "blanket waiver", or something similar for IND's and Informed Consent ? Since it has been proven that the DOD did not comply with the FDA standards concerning the waiver agreement, such as keeping records, etc, and the FDA has not held them accountable for the loss of life and the loss of Quality of life for the people affected by service in the Persian Gulf war, how is the FDA going to hold the DOD accountable of the gross and criminal negligence ?
     

  • Where did the DOD get their supply of Antibotulism ?
     

  • What new Drugs or other products were resultant of using service-members as lab-rats,
     

  • Why were service-members not told their Gas Masks could not protect them from a weapon the US government claimed Saddam had (and was going to use) - but yet, the same was manufactured in the US by the US/ISRAELIS?
     

  • If Saddam had this special weapon and not the US or Israel, how did Saddam make enough of the product, and how was his military able to deploy it over such a wide area he nor his Scuds could reach (to include the US "wink-wink"), and why is it that we have not been able to find any trace of residue in Scud Warheads in Iraq or from those that did hit Tel-Aviv?
     

  • Why were Iraqi munitions bunkers and the weapons inside quickly destroyed by the US "after" the fighting was over and when we controlled the ground?
     

  • Were any of the weapons inside Iraqi bunkers that were destroyed US Chemical or Biological Weapons we took to Iraq?
     

  • Why were service-members not told the vaccine administered would not "really" protect them?
     

  • Why were service-members forced to accept a vaccine with a special synthetic HIV/Anti-HIV Mycoplasma component?
     

  • What testing has the FDA, VA, or DOD performed "prior-to" the Gulf War, to know the results of compromising the immune system with a HIV/Anti-HIV (AIDS-EBOLA) vaccine, combined with the PB pill and then exposure to DU in this deadly combination that was known in advance all were to be used?
     

  • Why did the United States Military hold a conference with Peter Kawaja the day of Desert Storm invasion?
     

  • Is Robert Meuller / Muller the same person (now Homeland Security) who compelled Peter Kawaja to testify at Federal Grand Juries which were rigged to "tailor the answers"?
     

  • Why was a Presidential WAR POWERS ACT Search Warrant issued on Peter Kawaja to take his evidence?
     

  • Why was the evidence obtained in the illegal raid not made public in 1990 before Desert Storm, but was Sealed as US National Security?  (if the evidence proved Saddam's spies and agents were procuring WMD to use against America, "wink-wink")
     

  • Why was Peter Kawaja who operated for the US Government under a code name in counter-terrorism raided during Desert Shield after he sent a Fed-Ex package to code name: M323-CF at the NSA asking if the US was in a joint venture "with" international terrorists to develop US - WMD to be used in Desert Storm?
     

  • If the information seized at gunpoint exposed a "foreign terrorist plot" to injure American service-members in an upcoming war, why was the evidence sealed and not made public, and why did the US not use it to arrest and prosecute those terrorists?
     

  • WHO ARE THE TERRORISTS? WHY WERE THEY NOT IDENTIFIED SINCE 1990?
     

  • Why has no one been prosecuted since 1990?
     

  • How is it that the Barbouti family fled Saddam's reach in London and was allowed to relocate and be "protected" by the US and live in Texas near George Bush ALL THESE YEARS and through Gulf War II? (especially if he was an agent of Saddam "wink-wink")
     

  • What is the Barbouti connection to the Bush family and the Banking industry?
     

  • Who owned TPBG (US-bank) where the Queen of England (and other elitists) had untold sums of moneys in it?
     

  • Who really funded the RABTA - Libya Pharma-150 WMD plant?
     

  • Why were photos of CIA agents available/seen at Pharma-150?
     

  • Why did the US bomb the Rabta plant claiming it was dangerous and then construct a clone IN THE US?
     

  • Why was the same contractor (Barbouti) of Pharma-150 WELL KNOWN AS SUCH, allowed to enter the US, his son apply to own a  bank (see Bush family scandals), when Haidar Barbouti was not even a holder of a Green Card, came in as a student, claimed no income BUT had 40 million to invest to start a bank, which is illegal and against US law. Yet the FBI approved all of this and the 200 MILLION in "chemical and other" US assets, to include OIL RIGS?
     

  • How did the US-PIT plant bypass EPA rules for HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL?
     

  • How was the PIT Plant, a clone of Pharma-150, allowed to be constructed in a predominant residential area of Palm Beach County, Florida, complete with armed guards and Haz-Mat area with scrub-down/decontamination rooms?
     

  • WHAT "food product" made this necessary?
     

  • Why was a Hydrogen Cyanide Detection system necessary in a food processing plant? The mere installation manuals with WARNING - Skull & Bones DEATH SIGNS on every page, even if you (me) the installer was to take one smell of the sample kit designed to calibrate the heads - would DROP DEAD ON THE SPOT.
     

  • Why was a special concrete enforced 4-hour firewall room with special sensors, cameras and drainage (ad nauseam) required to STORE the Hazardous waste? 
     

  • Why did the Fire Chief of Boca Raton state to Peter Kawaja; I want a bullet proof glass door installed so we can see into your Comm.Center, because when we respond to ANY call to this location, we will do so in FULL MOPP GEAR and if we see any of your security team laying on the floor, WE WILL NOT ENTER THE BUILDING!  (Veterans, weep - you do not know the half of it yet and what I have endured for all these years of my life carrying this information trying to help you). 
     

  • If Barbouti gave secret WMD to Saddam to kill Americans, why is the entire family PROTECTED by the US?
     

  • Is Barbouti another Osama / Saddam CIA-MOSSAD triple agent?
     

  • If the evidence acquired by Peter Kawaja was so important that the US seized it under the International Emergency Economic War Powers Act, how did it become useless or unimportant to use to defend or protect Americans and America, or to prosecute the perps?
     

  • In a law suit Kawaja filed against the Bush Administration, federal agents and US attorneys, 100 John Does et al, the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT appointed and used taxpayer money to defend ALL federal defendants. The US pleaded for an extension of time to respond which Kawaja granted. The US then filed a Motion to Dismiss the suit based solely on immunity from prosecution under color of law - EVEN IF THEY COMMITTED THESE MISCONDUCT. The US did not refute, rebut, or deny the CRIMINAL CHARGES, the  charges of TREASON and CRIMES AGAINST AMERICA, but agreed that even if they were guilty of (what they changed the words to) "misconduct" - that all of them should have immunity from being prosecuted. However, within the same document, the US argued that this suit involved an ongoing investigation into the manufacture and use (in the US) of ILLEGAL WMD TO BE USED AGAINST AMERICAN FORCES.  If the US government and Military knew this BEFORE Operation Desert Storm (they did), were American Service-Members told this information?
     

  • Why did the Bush Administration not share the above information with the American people when trying to win support for going to war with Iraq? Would there have been more questions? Would there have to be a Congressional Hearing into why the "evidence" is not available, why, who has it?
     

  • If the WMD were illegally "made in the USA" - and not sold to Saddam via US Commerce Department and not a part of the Riegle Report, HOW did Saddam end up with these "illegal" WMD?  Did he?
     

  • If Saddam had illegal WMD "made in the USA" - why was this not a big story during Gulf War I?
     

  • If Saddam used these illegal WMD in Gulf War I - why didn't the UN come to Peter Kawaja and why has the US not made a big deal about THESE SPECIFIC KNOWN (US) illegal WMD all these years?
     

  • If Saddam used these WMD in Gulf War I as we KNOW the US has used "controlled opposition mouthpieces" since 1991 to infer he did, and if Saddam is THE cause of GWS from Gulf War I, WHY - REPEAT - WHY, would the US go back to war with Saddam in Gulf War II - and AGAIN, not inform US service-members that Saddam had a "special" WMD?
     

  • Since George Bush made the claim that Saddam had WMD and THAT WAS (one of the main) the reason we went to war with him again, WHY can't we find these WMD or traces of these WMD? Seeing the US - PIT Plant and the "process" is known to the US/ISRAELIS (not Saddam BTW)?
     

  • How is it that since we had from 1991 to 2003 to take it apart or make something to defend against IT, that Saddam was any new threat? Come on people start thinking - remember all the SCARE about Saddam WMD reasons to create Gulf War II?
     

  • AGAIN - if Saddam did not get the process BUT INSTEAD the US/ISRAELIS do have it - who is the perpetrator of GWS?
     

  • WHO controls the process for Prussian Blue?
     

  • If Saddam really had special (significant) WMD - why didn't George Bush parade Peter Kawaja on national TeeVee to corroborate his claims and say, yes, let me tell you what he has? Wouldn't this have helped Bush's neocons?  OHH, you mean he couldn't because if the US ever acknowledged anything to do with Peter Kawaja, the US will have a lot of questions to answer about who really has and used the WMD in Gulf I and Gulf II.  ..?
     

  • And so - the ruse Riegle Report and the mouthpieces who were used to bring you the sad tale of GWS and Saddam did it using the Riegle Report NOT ever mentioning Peter Kawaja - who has DIFFERENT information, they and their story must stand. And so it has been and is today, perhaps why you understand how certain people who commit crimes against you can get away with their money scams so long as they can continue to be used by the perpetrators and so long as they stick to their "story". Shades of Joyce Riley, et al.
     

  • TBC.....................

 

    WAR CRIMES

 

There are two trains of thoughts you believe that could have happened in Desert Storm.

 

A third theory that is the one that has been floating by Nicolson, Riley, and every person who has written a book

and claim to be experts based on the (Jim Tuite - neocon) Riegle Report: Saddam used the components (as outlined in the Riegle Report) and concocted a WMD that he used in Desert Storm. This does not warrant my time to waste explaining further why it is a ruse.

 

And so here are the two ways war crimes can be prosecuted. This is the focus and goal we need to achieve:

 

This is where, why, and how veterans (and even civilian support members and the general population) can get relief.

 

1.) Saddam was given illegal WMD manufactured in the US and transferred to Iraq via the MOSSAD-CIA so Saddam could use it on Americans and so the US could blame Iraq. Note I didn't say the US sold components (ala the Riegle Report) via the Commerce Department. If the US wants to plead the PIT plant and Dr. Barbouti transferred (illegally) WMD to Iraq I would love to have that in writing as a GUILTY PLEA and I can prosecute and prove War Crimes. America kills its own.  This is TREASON

 

2.) The US used American service-members both as lab rats and also knowingly deployed their WMD (why we destroyed the bunkers after the war when we had control of them) and via Vaccines (and other-see Kawaja's THE MISSION document) running several concurrent tests), the returning service-members report to the VA in each home state, blood is drawn, tested and the results of a certain batch known. Those who became suspicious of the DOD/VA (partially because Peter Kawaja started talking out loud, and partially because their inner sense from what they experienced told them not to trust) - then heard Joyce Riley with Garth Nicolson saying, send us a blood sample, we will test your blood for free and tell you if you have a Mycoplasma infection.  No matter where a vet went to, the VA-DOD ended up with the results. Enter the Murrah Building bombing (where VA Hard Files were stored), a disgruntled Gulf Veteran Tim McVeigh with a chip implant (lots more to say) America kills its own. This is TREASON

 

 

TAKE YOUR PICK
EITHER WAY PROVES CRIMES AGAINST VETERANS THAT HAVE NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

 

EITHER-BOTH ARE TREASON & WAR CRIMES

 

This is where we start...

These are the issues.....

 

WE CAN DO IT - THE EVIDENCE EXISTS

It isn't the Riegle Report!

 

Jackie Patru with Joyce Riley
(1.4 hour excerpts from 6-hours)

1995 - SEDUCTION/DECEPTION 1-hour EXCERPT
To: Peter Kawaja (Wallace) from Joyce Riley (Wallace)
That is how/what she named the tape/wrote on it - by Joyce Riley.
 

 

 

Back to Top

 

 

Copyright © 2011 by Peter Kawaja / agwva.org. 

  9989765 counter reset/zeroed: 10/05/11

 

Enter a long URL to make tiny: