MISSION  ABOUT  CONTACT  DOCUMENTS  RADIO SHOW 

 

 

MISSION

 

TRUTH, JUSTICE, & RELIEF FOR GULF WAR VETERANS
 


 

These all surround covert counter-terrorism activities and a Law Suit filed by Peter Kawaja.

The charges laid in Kawaja's Suit have never been refuted. A few of the 34 counts in the Complaint are as follows ;

01.) False statements within a Government Agency, Title 18 USC ss 35.1001.

02.) WAR CRIMES - crimes when death occurs, Title 18 USC ss 34.

03.) Concealment, removal - Title 18 USC ss 2071.

04.) Aiding and Abetting, Title 18 USC s 3.

05.) Obstruction of Justice, Title 18 USC s 1505 / USC s 2 (26).

06.) Defrauding America, Title 18, USC s 1101 (25).

The legal action was brought by Peter Kawaja and the International Security Group, Inc., (1994) as Plaintiffs, v. various [named] Agents (agencies/US attorneys etc) of the U.S. Government and 100 John Does. (Bush Administration).

The UNITED STATES Government made a determination to appoint the US Attorney's Office to represent the Defendants, thereby admitting (in our observation) to the criminality's (and guilt). This decision to appoint "government" attorneys and the U.S. Attorney's Office to represent the Defendants was made after an initial response to the Plaintiff (Kawaja) filing Suit.

The government entered a pleading for a 45 day extension of time to respond to the Complaint, which was granted by Kawaja.

The Government of the UNITED STATES, after reviewing the Complaint by Kawaja, decided to pay for (at taxpayer expense), and represent all of the Defendants'. This indicates that the Government (after reviewing the charges within the Complaint), determined there was "liability" on the part of the government, which now had to extend its "protections" to these federal Defendants.

The U.S. Attorney's Office filed a  "DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT", on behalf of all the Defendants, on the basis of ABSOLUTE and QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.

The U.S. Attorney's Office entered into court records amongst many things, that indeed this case involved weapons of mass destruction to be used by terrorist nations against the United States. However, in the same pleading, the U.S. Attorney's Office states in their "Conclusion" : "The AUSA is protected by absolute immunity, and the agents are protected by qualified immunity."

The U.S. Attorney's Office plead that even if the Defendants committed these "misconduct" (CRIMES), all the Defendants should be granted immunity from Prosecution.

The U.S. Attorney's Office, never entered a pleading ; Refuting, Rebutting, or Denying "any" of the 34 Criminal charges, to include TREASON and WAR CRIMES.

Knowing the severity of the charges, the Judge in this case, instead of making a ruling himself (we suspect because he could not), had a Magistrate rule to Dismiss the case based on immunity. However, the chief Judge, some six months later (when in obvious DEFAULT), filed a response himself, to another filings made by Peter Kawaja after the fraudulent (supposed) Dismissal, indicating, the case is not closed officially, as the Judge made a ruling on a filing almost six months "after the fact" (traversed). The case sits. Kawaja's Suit cannot be dismissed based on a pleading of immunity, and there are no statute of limitations for Treason, war crimes, crimes against America, and murder.

Why can Kawaja's "evidence" be used in both civil and criminal actions ?

* Kawaja's "evidence" (that portion prior to Desert Storm) was seized under a fraudulent WAR POWERS ACT Search Warrant.

* The U.S. Government not only seized this evidence, but Sealed it as U.S. National Security in 1990, prior to Operation Desert Storm. (It remains sealed to this day).

* Federal Agents swore under oath in the "affidavit for search" enough to both tie this evidence to the upcoming Gulf War, and that American Forces were knowingly placed in Harms Way. Yet the war proceeded and the evidence was sealed.

* The U.S. Government itself made this evidence National Security, and tied it to Binary Weapons to be used in the Gulf War - and did all this "prior to" the war.

* Kawaja's "evidence" is documented in Depositions under oath by federal agents, persons with criminal liability turned into now government witnesses, and by U.S. intelligence agencies.

* Kawaja's "evidence" has not been challenged by the U.S. Government, but in addition, Kawaja and his "evidence" has been established as factual and credible. Kawaja was Subpoenaed to three Federal Grand Juries "representing" the UNITED STATES. The U.S. presented Kawaja as "credible" and to be believed as "their expert" - to these "federal" Grand Juries .

* Precedent - by virtue of fact that Kawaja's original Suit and the criminal charges were never refuted, but the U.S. Government sought dismissal for its Agents based on immunity even if they did do it, future Suits by Kawaja can incorporate this fact.

* The President of the UNITED STATES-Bill Clinton, turned over certain portions of Kawaja's evidence to the DOD [March 29.1995], and the DOD opened a separate case (95-L95724) under Kawaja's name regarding Binary Weapons in the Gulf War.

* The following will substantiate "Prior Knowledge, Intent, Misprision of a felony" ;

Did the President of the United States, Bill Clinton - tell the truth to the PAC on Gulf Illnesses Jan.7.1997 - when he responded : (verbatim) "No one has ever suggested that anybody intentionally imposed--exposed American soldiers to these dangers, and there is nothing--there is no reason that anyone in this government should ever do anything but just try to get at the truth and get it out and do what is right for the veterans."

Did Dr. Joyce Lashof of the PAC tell the truth when she said in response to a question about the possibility of a cover-up : "we found no evidence of a cover-up in our work."

Criminal and civil complaints can be brought on behalf of all Gulf Veterans, independent action on behalf the American civilian population, and yet another action on behalf of the entire World population.

The DSWCC is named Beneficiary to Peter Kawaja's "evidence", which is not restricted only to what is already filed in court, or what was taken in the illegal raid in 1990, but what else exists, what "CARE PACKAGES" came after the war, the whereabouts known only by Eileen Kawaja.

On the civil side, we can bring a Multi Billion Dollar class action suit and make it stick.

 

To accomplish our goals, we need to seek the truth behind Operation Desert Storm-Gulf War I (and now Gulf War II), as to;


 

    WAR CRIMES

 

There are two trains of thoughts and/or two things that could have happened in Desert Storm.

 

A third theory that is the one that has been floating by Nicolson, Riley, and every person who has written a book

and claim to be experts based on the (Jim Tuite - neocon) Reigle Report: Saddam used the components (as outlined in the Reigle Report) and concocted a WMD that he used in Desert Storm. This does not warrant my time to waste explaining further why it is a ruse.

 

And so here are the two ways war crimes can be prosecuted. This is the focus and goal we need to achieve:

 

This is where, why, and how veterans (and even civilian support members and the general population) can get relief.

 

1.) Saddam was given illegal WMD manufactured in the US and transferred to Iraq via the MOSSAD-CIA so Saddam could use it on Americans and so the US could blame Iraq. America kills its own.

 

2.) The US used American service-members both as lab rats and also knowingly deployed their WMD with/via Vaccines (running several concurrent tests), the returning service-members report to the VA in each home state, blood is drawn, tested and the results of a certain batch known. Those who became suspicious of the DOD/VA (partially because Peter Kawaja started talking out loud, and partially because their inner sense from what they experienced told them not to trust) - then heard Joyce Riley with Garth Nicolson saying, send us a blood sample, we will test your blood for free and tell you if you have a mycoplasma infection.  No matter where a vet went to, the VA-DOD ended up with the results. America kills its own.

 

TAKE YOUR PICK
EITHER WAY PROVES CRIMES AGAINST VETERANS THAT HAVE NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

 

EITHER-BOTH ARE TREASON & WAR CRIMES

 

This is where we start...

These are the issues.....

Let us acquire all the information...

Let us formulate and agree upon a course of legal action..

 

WE CAN DO IT - THE EVIDENCE EXISTS

It isn't the Reigle Report!

 

Jackie Patru with Joyce Riley
(1.4 hour excerpts from 6-hours)

1995 - SEDUCTION/DECEPTION 1-hour EXCERPT
To
: Peter Kawaja (Wallace) from Joyce Riley (Wallace)
That is how/what she named the tape/wrote on it - by Joyce Riley.
 

 

 

 

IF YOU WANT TO HELP VETERANS AND AMERICA - WHAT YOU CAN DO IS SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THIS WEBSITE

 

Back to Top


Hit Counter

 

© 1995 - 2004 Peter Kawaja. All rights reserved.